CLARITY Act Vote Looms: What Happens If the Crypto Bill Fails
With a Senate vote on the CLARITY Act expected around September 15, Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone is telling the crypto industry not to count on a rescue from Congress if the bill fails. Asked directly whether the market structure package could still be revived in a lame-duck session or early next Congress, Carbone was blunt: “I think that is unlikely.”
The bill, which splits oversight of digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, has been the industry’s central legislative priority for more than a year. Its fate now appears to hinge on a narrow window of Senate floor time before lawmakers leave Washington for the midterm campaign.
Also read: Treasury's Stablecoin Rule Puts New Compliance Burden on Exchanges, Brokers, and Wallets
Regulators Would Move First — and Fast
Carbone’s most confident prediction is that the void would be filled by agencies rather than legislators. “You’re going to see the regulators moving fast and furious,” he said, pointing to SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, who has publicly signaled he intends to advance CLARITY’s core goals through guidance and rulemaking rather than waiting on Capitol Hill.
The first concrete step, in Carbone’s view, would be an innovation exemption from the SEC — a carve-out that would let certain token projects operate under lighter compliance requirements while the agency formalizes a broader framework. Such an exemption could arrive within weeks of a failed vote, he suggested.
Carbone framed that outcome as the governing reality for the next two years. “That will be the regulatory framework implementation for the next two years,” he said. “It’ll likely be primarily agency action.”
The ‘Skinny’ Path Runs Through the NDAA
The second scenario Carbone outlined involves breaking the bill apart. CLARITY is not a single, clean piece of legislation — it is an amalgamation of roughly 40 to 50 separate bills merged into one package. That structure, he noted, makes it possible to extract individual provisions and attach them to must-pass legislation later in the year.
His most likely vehicle is the National Defense Authorization Act, which has passed Congress every year for six decades and is widely viewed as the closest thing to a guaranteed legislative train. Still, Carbone was candid about the odds: “I don’t know if the latter will be successful,” he said.
The distinction matters for readers because the two paths produce materially different rules. A full bill would give the SEC and CFTC durable statutory authority that survives changes in administration. Agency rulemaking, by contrast, can be revised or unwound by the next set of commissioners — a lesson the crypto industry learned during the prior SEC leadership when enforcement-driven policy shifted sharply from one chairman to the next.
What to Watch Before the Vote
Three signals will indicate which path is materializing:
- Senate floor scheduling in the days around September 15 — a vote that slips past the pre-election recess effectively ends the legislative window Carbone describes.
- SEC guidance or exemptive relief published in the weeks after a failed vote. Carbone expects this before year-end if the bill stalls.
- NDAA conference negotiations, where a slimmed-down provision could surface without separate floor debate.
Breaking the package into pieces is not a frictionless process. Each provision pulled out for a must-pass bill would face its own lobbying fight, and the combined votes that made CLARITY viable as a package may not hold for its fragments. Carbone’s own hedge — that he is unsure the slim version succeeds — reflects that arithmetic.
The CLARITY Act’s collapse would leave the United States as one of the few major jurisdictions without a comprehensive digital-asset statute, even as the European Union’s MiCA framework and similar regimes in Singapore and the UAE have already taken effect. For US-based exchanges and token issuers, that gap has meant building compliance strategies around enforcement discretion rather than clear rules.
Whether the bill passes or fails, the practical outcome for market participants narrows to a single question: which regulator writes the rules, and how long those rules last. Carbone’s answer is that the agencies will write them — and that Washington will not get a clean do-over anytime soon.
This article reports on regulatory developments and is not financial or investment advice. Digital asset markets are volatile and uncertain, and policy outcomes can change rapidly.
